‘Bungeishunju’ of Japan issued ‘Story of Republic of Korea (Republic of Korea story)’ of Risacaecaol (Juncus effusus var.decipiens Yeongheung) professor whom the books publication and Kiparan (representative = Ann Byonfn) issued in a Japanese version in May, 2007. The title of a book is the same ‘Story of Republic of Korea’ as the title of a book of South Korea
In ‘Story of Republic of Korea’, as for ‘The history is recognized again before and after release’ put on the market in February, 2006, author’s Prof. Risacaecaol is a book written again , saying that “It is a little comprehensible, and it is legible”. The lecture contents of one week was an amendment and was supplemented, and was issued as a book completed by the tripling amount though received the request of the EBS radio network, and was open to the public to the member of the public of the first manuscript in the special lecture mode.
‘Story of Republic of Korea’ overall interprets the present age of South Korea Kon history again.
After all, only construction : the history. For us, it is Republic of Korea Kon modern when the 20th kaleidoscopic century was passed historical and it is true to talk, and to have interpreted only the history bound by feelings ‘Racism’. The author insists that he or she should restrict us, classify the applied racism in dismantling Shite, and make the man individual of which the nature is the self-regard mind the unit of the history description. It solves it by the sight with a new big problem and issue etc. of the present age history like the cause, the colony deprivation theory, the pro-Japanese sect clearing problem, and the Japanese army comfort woman problem that a Korean dynasty is defeated, etc.
The Yomiuri Shimbun of Japan treated the book review of ‘Story of Republic of Korea’ of Prof. Risacaecaol on last cultural side May 3 and the specific gravity was treated by the column putting it. The author is Kokura Hagemushi who is the South Korea thought researcher.
Mr. Kokura is starting the initial segment of the book review in this way. , saying that “Feeling that a truly courageous South Korean is here”.
Mr. Kokura is surprised , saying that “Always hold back to ‘Race’ no matter how the South Korean has talked about the history to the loud voice up to now” , saying that assumption Shite and “Prof. Risacaecaol famous as the critic of New Right is this book in South Korea, and ‘The subject of the history is clearly talked as not the race but the individual'”.
Moreover,, Lee..Prof…South Korea..present age..history..tradition..civilization..outpatient..civilization..collide..connect..civilization..history..conversion process..manage..(..tiger..good..evil..dichotomy between the two..historical view..renounce..introduce.The compound.
To tell the truth, Prof. Risacaecaol is severely attacking the race historical view and the racism with this book. However, do not think him to be an anti-nationalist. Prof. Lee only says that narrow-mindedness the desire only that only the race is an unit to which the history only does nothingness 2. The show lingua is a history of making ‘Individual’ an unit as the alternative proposal of the history that he made ‘Race’ an unit like the indication of Mr. Kokura.
Mr. Kokura is assessing to this book through the book review, “Book in the country of ..strength (today’s dust).. on which it is made remarks that it is necessary to be released from “Revenant of a past history” by the South Korean who doesn’t become a liberty from the history without the history’s being looked straight”.
The South Korean who is not the liberty from the past wants to learn which place liberty for this book review.
Source: New daily(Korean)
http://www.newdaily.co.kr/articles/view/26056
コメント